The cryptography industry is still in shock from its greatest hacking to date. Crypto Exchange Bybit lost more than $ 1.4 billion in its cold wallet. Recently, the pirates have proven to be the famous Lazarus group of North Korea. They are busy moving the active ingredients, and some have found their way to wallets linked to Solana carpet prints.
Monday, February 24, online investigator Zachxbt revealed New details in the evolutionary case of Lazarus. Pirates are now actively trying to whiten the crypto, hoping that complex transactions mask the origins of the fund.
To thwart this attempt, Zachxbt compiled 920 addresses This received funds from the Lazarus hack. However, in his investigation, he found that one of the addresses of money money was linked to the prints of the memecoin carpet.
An address received 1,08 USDC from Piracy de Bybit, via a Solana bridge to BSC. The address then distributed these funds between more than 30 other addresses. According to Zachxbt, one of these addresses launched and exchanged tokens on pump.fun.
Pump.fun is a popular platform for same launches, because it facilitates the creation of tokens. However, he also gained popularity among crypto crooks, who use the site for carpet prints targeting without distrust investors. This has caused speculation on North Korea using stolen funds to launch carpet prints.
Bybit Hack: What’s going on?
The hacking of $ 1.4 billion, the most important in the history of cryptography, aroused a significant discussion on what is happening afterwards. To start, the Lazare group is directly linked to North Korea. The country uses the hacking product to finance its operations, including its soldiers.
If the Lazare group manages to launder money, this will go directly to finance North Korea, a country sanctioned by most of the developed world. Therefore, many call for drastic measurements, such as a hard fork of the Ethereum blockchain.
In response to the hack, several people have called Ethereum To answer as he did with the Hack Dao. The supporters of the idea suggest that the network should make a hard fork to reverse the transaction.
Although this is technically possible, it is unlikely that it will happen. First, as Ethereum is a decentralized chain, the realization of a consensus among all the validators can be difficult. In addition, a hard fork would go against the decentralized ethics of Ethereum. Currently, security companies urge the platforms to blacklist all addresses associated with hacking.
Find out more: Zachxbt reveals the Lazarus group behind a piracy of $ 1B